Gtx 1660 Ti Vs Gtx 1070
Price now 546$ Games supported 97% Cost now 435$ Games supported 97% Comparison of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To go the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, only for precise cess you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a time to come computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (ability supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its blazon, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise just for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information volition prove useful if you need some particular applied science for your purposes. APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark functioning comparing. Annotation that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot discover some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upwardly in comments section, nosotros usually fix problems quickly. This is probably the virtually ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics bill of fare a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, x, xi and 12 (the last existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX ten benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics menu with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base of operations located within a body of water cave, the other displaying a infinite fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. It used four tests based on ii scenes, ane beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX eleven characteristic level 10 benchmark that was used for abode PCs and basic notebooks. Information technology displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. But like Water ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced past 3DMark Dark Raid. Criterion coverage: xiv% Fire Strike is a DirectX eleven benchmark for gaming PCs. Information technology features two dissever tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Benchmark coverage: fourteen% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from eleven different exam scenarios. All these scenarios rely on straight usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping. Criterion coverage: 9% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete criterion, office of 3DMark suite. Ice Tempest was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven feature level 9 to display a battle betwixt two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid. Benchmark coverage: eight% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from xi dissimilar test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: v% This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation criterion uses Autodesk Maya thirteen engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than than 700 m polygons, in six different modes. Benchmark coverage: 2% This part of SPECviewperf 12 criterion emulates work with 3DS Max, executing 11 tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and blitheness for computer games. Benchmark coverage: ane% Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce GTX 1070. Usually measured in megahashes per 2nd. Let'due south see how expert the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across unlike resolutions: −three.5% +3.5% +64.4% −64.iv% −9.iii% +ix.three% +six.two% −6.2% +57.8% −57.8% +2.8% −2.viii% −9.2% +9.2% +1.6% −1.six% −12.5% +12.5% −12.5% +12.5% +ii.five% −2.5% −ii.i% +ii.1% −12.five% +12.5% −five.6% +5.vi% +22.2% −22.two% −6.iii% +6.iii% −5.6% +v.six% +26.7% −26.7% −1% +1% −8.6% +8.6% +0.viii% −0.8% −12.5% +12.5% −12.5% +12.5% −12.vii% +12.7% +4.7% −4.7% −1.2% +1.2% −iii.4% +3.4% −12.5% +12.5% −iii.viii% +3.8% +11.1% −xi.1% −4.9% +4.9% +ii.2% −ii.ii% +four.4% −4.four% −8.iii% +8.3% +3.2% −3.two% −1.6% +1.half-dozen% −12.5% +12.5% −8.8% +eight.viii% −12.v% +12.v% −12.5% +12.5% −xv.ii% +15.2% +three.seven% −3.7% −2% +two% −9.8% +ix.8% −25% +25% −x.5% +10.5% −66.7% +66.7% −one.5% +1.five% −9.2% +ix.2% −ii.six% +2.6% −12.5% +12.v% −9.vii% +9.7% −12.5% +12.v% −12.5% +12.5% −nine.5% +ix.five% +v.6% −5.6% +0% +0% +0% +0% −4% +4% −137% +137% −iv.7% +4.7% −309% +309% +0% +0% −8.6% +viii.6% −2% +ii% −12.v% +12.5% Judging past the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 since it shows better functioning. Should you nonetheless have questions concerning selection betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall reply. Do yous think we are right or mistaken in our selection? Vote past clicking "Like" push about your favorite graphics menu. Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower by 14% and lower by 23 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: The nearest GeForce GTX 1070's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX Vega 56, which is faster by i% and higher past 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1070: Nosotros selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less shut to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, too as rate them yourself. Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 on a calibration of 1 to 5: Here you lot can ask a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an fault or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPS1660 Ti vs 1070
General info
Identify in performance rating 112 92 Value for money 35.52 36.69 Compages Turing (2018−2021) Pascal (2016−2021) GPU code name Turing TU116 Pascal GP104 Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop Release date 22 Feb 2019 (3 years agone) 6 May 2016 (6 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $279 $379 Price now $546 (2x MSRP) $435 (1.1x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1536 no data CUDA cores no data 1920 Cadre clock speed 1500 MHz no data Boost clock speed 1770 MHz no data Number of transistors half dozen,600 million 7,200 million Manufacturing process engineering science 12 nm sixteen nm Thermal blueprint ability (TDP) 120 Watt no data Maximum GPU temperature no data 94 °C Texture fill rate 169.9 202.0 Floating-point performance no information half-dozen,463 gflops Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support no data PCIe iii.0 Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16 Length 229 mm 10.five" (26.7 cm) Height no data 4.376" (11.1 cm) Width 2-slot no data Recommended arrangement power (PSU) no information 500 Watt Supplementary power connectors 1x viii-pin no data SLI options no information + Memory
Memory type GDDR6 no data Maximum RAM corporeality 6 GB no information Retentiveness bus width 192 Chip 256 Chip Memory clock speed 12000 MHz 8 GB/s Retentiveness bandwidth 288.0 GB/due south 256 GB/s Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Brandish Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort DP 1.42, HDMI two.0b, Dual Link-DVI Multi monitor back up no data + HDMI + no data Thou-SYNC back up no information + Technologies
GPU Boost no information 3.0 VR Ready no information + Ansel no data + API back up
DirectX 12 (12_1) no data Shader Model 6.five 6.4 OpenGL four.vi 4.5 OpenCL i.ii no data Vulkan ane.two.131 + CUDA vii.5 + Benchmark performance
Overall score
Mining hashrates
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) no information 832 Mh/s Decred / DCR (Decred) no information 2.83 Gh/s Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) no data 28.69 Mh/southward Siacoin / SC (Sia) no data 1.75 Gh/s Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) no data 0.65 kh/s Zcash / ZEC (Equihash) no data 435.21 Sol/south Gaming functioning
Total HD 104 118 1440p 60 69 4K 38 48 Full Hd
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 78 45−50 Full Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 86 89 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 74 45−50 Battlefield 5 129 141 Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120 113 Cyberpunk 2077 71 45−fifty Far Weep 5 109 106 Far Cry New Dawn 98 107 Forza Horizon 4 131 129 Hitman 3 twoscore−45 45−50 Horizon Nothing Dawn 40−45 45−l Red Dead Redemption 2 82 80 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94 96 Watch Dogs: Legion twoscore−45 45−50 Total Hard disk
Loftier Preset
Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey 72 76 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55 45−50 Battlefield 5 112 119 Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 89 94 Cyberpunk 2077 57 45−50 Far Cry five 99 100 Far Weep New Dawn 93 101 Forza Horizon 4 122 121 Hitman three 40−45 45−50 Horizon Zip Dawn 40−45 45−fifty Metro Exodus 55 62 Reddish Dead Redemption ii 45 43 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82 83 The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt 116 120 Watch Dogs: Legion twoscore−45 45−50 Full Hard disk drive
Ultra Preset
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 53 55 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla l 45−50 Battlefield 5 102 107 Cyberpunk 2077 46 45−fifty Far Cry v 94 xc Far Cry New Dawn 84 91 Forza Horizon 4 97 94 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 63 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 45−fifty 1440p
Loftier Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 57 62 Hitman iii xl−45 45−fifty Horizon Null Dawn 40−45 45−50 Metro Exodus 33 38 Ruby Dead Redemption 2 28 27 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51 52 1440p
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41 45 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 36 45−50 Battlefield 5 76 84 Cyberpunk 2077 27 45−50 Far Weep 5 67 68 Far Cry New Dawn 65 71 Forza Horizon four 77 79 Lookout man Dogs: Legion twoscore−45 45−50 4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31 34 Hitman iii 40−45 45−50 Horizon Aught Dawn 40−45 45−50 Metro Exodus 21 23 Reddish Expressionless Redemption 2 xix 18 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26 26 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43 43 4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 25 26 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19 45−50 Battlefield 5 43 45 Cyberpunk 2077 xi 45−50 Far Cry 5 35 35 Far Cry New Dawn 35 38 Forza Horizon iv 51 52 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 45−fifty Advantages and disadvantages
Functioning rating 39.51 45.17 Novelty 22 February 2019 6 May 2016 Toll $279 $379 Memory jitney width 192 256 Retentiveness bandwidth 288 256 Fleck lithography 12 nm 16 nm
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti past AMD
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1070 by AMD
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-vs-GeForce-GTX-1070
0 Response to "Gtx 1660 Ti Vs Gtx 1070"
Post a Comment